Late finishing and sow lameness are significant concerns for our industry. Management practices such as adjusting flooring types and floor space, performing skeletal structure evaluations, utilizing foot baths and many other options have been employed over the years to try to reduce lameness. The use of organic minerals in the feed have also been implemented to improve foot health and reduce lameness in sows.
In swine, Dr. Rosero published work that demonstrated that sow reproduction can benefit when they are fed certain fatty acids at specific levels (125 g/d of linoleic acid and 10 g/d of alpha-linolenic acid). In other species, research has shown that the ratio between linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid can also benefit joint health. However, little research has been conducted in swine that evaluates the potential impact of both linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids on joint health utilizing conventional sources of energy (corn oil, soy oil, flaxseed oil and tallow).
Two studies were conducted at Iowa State University to evaluate the potential impact of high and low energy diets and also the ratio of linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids on joint health. In the first study, Becker and Greiner evaluated the impact of feeding high energy (3.55 ME Kcal/kg) and low energy (3.29 ME Kcal/kg) diets to grow-finish swine. Within each energy level, the pigs were fed either a diet containing 23:1 or 12:1 linoleic:linolenic acid ratio. The 23:1 ratio would be similar to that of a common United States corn/soybean meal/distiller's grain finishing ration. Pigs receiving the high energy diets had increased final body weight, average daily gain and improved feed efficiency (Table 1).
Gilts receiving diets the 12:1 linoleic:linolenic acid ratio had similar final body weight to barrows and increased average daily gain compared to gilts fed the 23:1 ratio. The low energy diet tended to reduce inflammatory markers in joint fluid collected from the hock and carpus joints (Figure 1).
In the second study, pigs were fed an equal energy level with differing inclusions of linoleic acid and linoleic:linolenic acid ratios. Pigs were provided either a high (30 g/kg) or low (15 g/kg) linoleic acid level with a high (20:1), moderate (12:1) or low (4:1) linoleic:linolenic acid ratio. The 4:1 ratio would be similar to what has been reported to reduce joint inflammation in humans and dogs. Gilts receiving a high linoleic:linolenic acid ratio (20:1) had increased body weight and average daily gain compared to gilts receiving the other ratios (Table 2).
Inflammation marker concentrations decreased as the pigs grew in weight; however, the diets did not impact the level of inflammation in either the hock or carpus joint fluid (Figure 2).
To conclude, the high and low linoleic:linolenic ratios can be fed at varying energy and linoleic acid levels without impacting growth. Feeding a 4:1 linoleic:linolenic acid ratio does not appear to alter joint inflammation in swine. The linoleic:linolenic ratio can impact the growth of gilts and the use of lower energy diets does appear to reduce joint inflammation. In addition, as the pig matures, inflammation within the joint appears to decline indicating that any potential impact of diet on reducing joint inflammation needs to occur during periods of rapid growth.
This project was funded in part or wholly by The National Pork Board and the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
Source: Spenser Becker and Laura Greiner, who are solely responsible for the information provided, and wholly owns the information. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.