Full-fat soybeans: Valuable source of energy, digestible P for pigsFull-fat soybeans: Valuable source of energy, digestible P for pigs
Protein digesting enzymes are impaired by trypsin inhibitors, which can reduce digestibility, depress growth rate, and decrease feed utilization efficiency in swine.
October 31, 2024
By N.C. Ruiz-Arias, S.A. Lee, H.H. Stein, University of Illinois
Whole soybeans, from which the oil is not extracted, are referred to as full-fat soybeans and may be used in diets for poultry and pigs because of it is high contents of protein, oil, linoleic acid, vitamin E and lecithin. Unprocessed raw soybeans, however, contain several anti-nutritional factors including trypsin inhibitors that make them unsuitable to be included in diets for pigs and poultry, because the protein digesting enzymes are impaired by the trypsin inhibitors, which reduces digestibility, depresses growth rate, and decreases the efficiency of feed utilization when fed to swine.
Full-fat soybeans, therefore, need to be heated to reduce the concentration of trypsin inhibitors, and that is often accomplished using an extruder. However, there is a lack of data for the nutritional value of FFSB. Therefore, two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that there is no difference among five sources of FFSB in the digestible energy, the metabolizable energy, and the standardized total tract digestibility of P when fed to growing pigs.
In Experiment 1, 48 growing pigs (initial body weight: 30.86 ± 1.64 kg) were allotted to six diets using a randomized complete block design with eight replicate pigs per diet. A basal diet based on corn as the only energy source was formulated and five diets contained corn and each source of FFSB were formulated as well.
In Experiment 2, 80 pigs (initial body weight: 16.73 ± 3.16 kg) were allotted to a randomized complete block design with 10 diets and eight replicate pigs per diet. Five diets containing each source of FFSB as the only source of P were formulated. Five additional diets were formulated by adding 1,000 FTU/kg of microbial phytase to the original five diets.
In both experiments, all diets were fed in meal form and pigs were fed at 3.2 times the energy requirement for maintenance in two equal meals. Throughout the experiments, pigs had free access to water. Pigs were fed experimental diets for 12 days in each experiment with feces and urine (Exp. 1) or only feces (Exp. 2) being collected for four days after five days of adaptation.
Results from Exp. 1 demonstrated that ME in corn was 3,759 kcal per kg dry matter (DM), and FFSB sources 01, 02, 03, 04 and 05 contained 4,957, 4,744, 4,920, 4,825 and 5,071 kcal ME per kg DM, respectively (Fig. 1). The ME in FFSB source 05 was greater (P < 0.05) than the ME in FFSB source 02 and 04. However, the DE and ME in all sources of FFSB were greater (P < 0.05) than in corn. There were no differences in DE:GE, ME:DE or ME:GE among the five sources of FFSB or between FFSB sources and corn.
Figure 1. Digestible energy and metabolizable energy in FFSB, kcal/kg DM.
Results from Exp. 2 demonstrated that were no interactions between use of phytase and source of FFSB, and no effects of use of phytase or source of FFSB were observed for feed intake, weight of feces excreted or daily basal endogenous P loss (Table 1). The ATTD and the STTD of P in diets with FFSB source 05 was greater (P < 0.05) than the ATTD and STTD of P in other sources of FFSB if no phytase was used, but if phytase was added to the diets, no differences among the five sources of FFSB were observed (interaction, P < 0.05). However, the ATTD and STTD of P was greater (P < 0.05) if phytase was used than if no phytase was used.
In conclusion, results demonstrated that concentrations of phytate and minerals varied slightly among the five sources of FFSB used in the experiment. The high ME in FFSB will result in diets containing FFSB having greater DE and ME than diets based on corn-soybean meal. Pigs consuming diets with FFSB, therefore, will consume more ME than pigs consuming diets without FFSB, which may be beneficial for younger pigs and lactating sows.
Results also demonstrated that FFSB source 05 had greater STTD of P than the other sources of FFSB if no microbial phytase was used, but if microbial phytase was added to the diets, no differences among growing regions were observed. However, regardless of growing region, the STTD of P in FFSB was increased if microbial phytase is used.
About the Author
You May Also Like