National Hog Farmer is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Consumers Union Fires Back at Pork Industry, Calls for Increased Regulation of Pork Products

Consumers Union would like to see a more regulated pork industry
<p> Consumers Union, the advocacy arm of Consumer Reports magazine, is calling for increased regulation of the pork industry.</p>
This week Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm of&nbsp;Consumer Reports magazine, issued a press release questioning the safety of pork and countering pork industry claims that a recent Consumer Reports&nbsp;article was off-base.

This week Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports magazine, issued a press release questioning the safety of pork and countering pork industry claims that a recent Consumer Reports article was off-base.

In the press release, Jean Halloran, director of Food Policy Initiatives for Consumers Union says the organization thinks government regulators and pork producers need to take some additional steps to insure the safety of pork.

Last month, Consumer Reports released a study on the safety of pork. The magazine claimed that 69% of the pork chops and ground pork tested as part of their study contained a bacteria called Yersinia enterocolitica.  Salmonella and Staphyloccus aureus also showed up in the tests.   In addition, almost all of the bacteria found on pork were said to be resistant to one or more antibiotics. Further, 20% of samples tested contained low levels of ractopamine, “a growth promoting drug that is banned in the European Union and China on safety grounds,” according to Halloran’s release.

Consumers Union believes these results are serious cause for concern.  Consequently, Consumers Union is urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce these pathogens and eliminate ractopamine from pork products, and address antibiotic resistance by ending the use of antibiotics on livestock except for treatment of sick animals.

The release states, “The pork industry, focused on its bottom line, unfortunately responded by attempting to shoot the messenger.  Despite the Consumer Reports test being one of the largest pork surveys of its kind to date, the pork industry attacked the study’s sample size as was too small and called the story ‘sensationalism.’”

The release continues, “Given Consumer Reports findings of Yersinia in more than two-thirds of pork samples tested, we think that pork producers, rather than complaining about test results, should start trying to reduce this pathogen.   USDA should also begin to regulate it.   We have urged USDA to do a larger research study, something it has been considering since at least 2010. USDA planned to test for this pathogen in its 2010 Nationwide Market Hog Microbiological Baseline Survey (MHBS) ‘because the transfer of these pathogens may occur…during slaughter.’ This USDA survey is designed to estimate the national prevalence and levels of bacteria in pork of public health concern. However inexplicably, when the actual study involving tests on thousands of samples, was completed, USDA failed to test for Yersinia. Rather, it tested only for salmonella–which USDA (and Consumer Reports) found at very low levels, less than five percent of samples.”

Halloran says that Richard Raymond, USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety in the Bush Administration, in a blog, argued that Consumer Reports “purported 69% contamination rate” seems inconsistent with a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) finding of just 950 laboratory-confirmed cases of Yersinia-induced illness in people in 2009, and asks how Consumer Reports can explain this.

According to Consumers Union, CDC says that the 950 confirmed cases are just the tip of the iceberg  because the vast majority of cases of food borne illness go unreported and they estimate that each year there are more likely to be close to 100,000 cases of foodborne illness caused by Yersinia.

“Consumers Union also urges the industry and the FDA to eliminate use of antibiotics in pork production except for treatment of sick animals.,” Halloran writes. “ We, and more than a dozen major medical organizations including the American Medical Association, the Infectious Disease Society of America, the World Health Organization, the American Public Health Association and many more, all believe that antibiotic use in animals is an important contributing cause of resistance problems in humans, and that because of this, at the very least, use of these valuable drugs should be prohibited for growth promotion use in animals.”

The release concludes, “Given the seriousness of the current crisis of antibiotic resistance, Consumers Union has launched a Meat Without Drugs campaign to convince major supermarket chains to sell only meat and poultry raised without antibiotics.”

See for information on this effort.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.